Virslīga · Head-to-head

Rīgas FS – FK Liepāja head-to-head

Rīgas FS and FK Liepāja have met 43 times in the league on our record (2016–2026): Rīgas FS 25 wins, FK Liepāja 9 wins, 9 draws. The latest meeting was Rīgas FS 0–0 FK Liepāja on 7 September.

43
meetings
25
Rīgas FS wins
9
draws
9
FK Liepāja wins
81–40
goals Rīgas FS – FK Liepāja

The last 10 meetings

The last 10 meetings
DateMatchScore
Virslīga · 2026
7 SepRīgas FS – FK Liepāja0–0
26 JunFK Liepāja – Rīgas FS0–2
8 MayRīgas FS – FK Liepāja5–0
13 MarFK Liepāja – Rīgas FS0–1
Virslīga · 2025
28 SepFK Liepāja – Rīgas FS2–2
4 JulRīgas FS – FK Liepāja2–1
14 MayFK Liepāja – Rīgas FS2–1
29 MarRīgas FS – FK Liepāja4–1
Virslīga · 2024
20 SepRīgas FS – FK Liepāja2–0
1 JulFK Liepāja – Rīgas FS1–3

Records

Records
RecordFigureMatch
Biggest win: Rīgas FS5–0Rīgas FS 5–0 FK Liepāja (May 2026)
Biggest win: FK Liepāja3–1FK Liepāja 3–1 Rīgas FS (June 2016)
Highest-scoring game8 goalsFK Liepāja 3–5 Rīgas FS (May 2018)
Longest unbeaten run: Rīgas FS17 gamesApril 2021 to March 2025, 13 wins among them
Longest unbeaten run: FK Liepāja3 gamesMay 2019 to August 2019, 1 win among them
Most common score2–0Rīgas FS won 2–0: 5 times in 43 meetings

Frequently asked questions

Who has won more meetings, Rīgas FS or FK Liepāja?

Rīgas FS have won more: 25 wins to 9 for FK Liepāja, with 9 draws, in 43 meetings.

When did Rīgas FS and FK Liepāja last meet?

The latest meeting was Rīgas FS 0–0 FK Liepāja on 7 September.

What is the biggest win in Rīgas FS – FK Liepāja games?

The widest margin belongs to Rīgas FS: Rīgas FS 5–0 FK Liepāja (May 2026).

What is the most common score in Rīgas FS – FK Liepāja games?

The most common score in Rīgas FS – FK Liepāja games is a 2–0 win for Rīgas FS: 5 times in 43 meetings.

See also

League games from our data: the completed seasons since 2014 and this season's games so far. History only, never a prediction.

The day's tips on Telegram

Every morning (about 10:00 Tallinn time) the day's card tips go to the free Telegram channel; on some days there are none, and we say so.